There are two main views in debate, which of them is that children should obey the rules set by parents and teachers. The other is that less control will help children to deal with their future adult life.

该话题的争论主要有两大观点。首先，孩子应该遵从家长和老师制定的规则。再者，少控制有利于孩子处理自己的未来生活。

As for the former, the advantages of it seem to be very apparent, which of them is that children can make a distinction between right and wrong things. And they will have a sense of principle and responsibility. Of course, the disadvantages are also very clear. Firstly, children will be lacking in imagination and creation. Secondly, they cannot make up their mind on their own.

前者的观点的优势很明显，他们认为孩子能够区别好的事情和坏的事情，而且他们会有一种纪律感和责任感。当然，劣势也很清楚。首先，孩子会变得缺乏想象创造力。其次，他们不会自己做决定。

Concerning the latter, the view seems to be reasonable because in this ways these children are more clever and active to create something special. However, the drawbacks couldn't be ignored as a result of a problem that children cannot get a clear understanding of their lifetime.

后者的观点似乎很有道理，因为在这样的管教方式下孩子会更加聪明，热爱创造。然而，缺点也不能忽视，因为会产生孩子对自己人生缺乏了解的情况。

Combining the both points, as far as I'm concerned, parents and teachers are supposed to instruct children to obey the primary principle when they do some deeds. Moreover, children need more freedom to realize their dreams. Only in this way can the problem be solved perfectly.

结合两者来看，我认为父母和老师应该指导孩子们在某些行为上遵守最基本的纪律。再则，孩子们应获得更多自由去实现梦想。我想这样就能圆满解决这事了。

In conclusion, we can't only support one side simply. On the contrary, we ought to choose different measures to educate children flexibly.

总之，我们不能只支持一方。相反地，我们应该选择不同的方式灵活教育孩子。